mirror of
https://github.com/tinygo-org/tinygo.git
synced 2026-08-05 03:27:48 +00:00
60f8a62978
This commit adds support for a scheduler that runs a scheduler on all available cores. It is meant to be used on baremetal systems with a fixed number of cores, such as the RP2040. The initial implementation adds support for multicore scheduling to the riscv-qemu target as a convenient testing target. This means that this new multicore scheduler is tested in CI, including a bunch of standard library tests (`make tinygo-test-baremetal`). This should ensure the new scheduler is reasonably well tested before trying to use it on harder-to-debug targets like the RP2040.
72 lines
2.3 KiB
Go
72 lines
2.3 KiB
Go
//go:build !tinygo.unicore
|
|
|
|
package task
|
|
|
|
// Futex-based mutex.
|
|
// This is largely based on the paper "Futexes are Tricky" by Ulrich Drepper.
|
|
// It describes a few ways to implement mutexes using a futex, and how some
|
|
// seemingly-obvious implementations don't exactly work as intended.
|
|
// Unfortunately, Go atomic operations work slightly differently so we can't
|
|
// copy the algorithm verbatim.
|
|
//
|
|
// The implementation works like this. The futex can have 3 different values,
|
|
// depending on the state:
|
|
//
|
|
// - 0: the futex is currently unlocked.
|
|
// - 1: the futex is locked, but is uncontended. There is one special case: if
|
|
// a contended futex is unlocked, it is set to 0. It is possible for another
|
|
// thread to lock the futex before the next waiter is woken. But because a
|
|
// waiter will be woken (if there is one), it will always change to 2
|
|
// regardless. So this is not a problem.
|
|
// - 2: the futex is locked, and is contended. At least one thread is trying
|
|
// to obtain the lock (and is in the contended loop, see below).
|
|
//
|
|
// For the paper, see:
|
|
// https://dept-info.labri.fr/~denis/Enseignement/2008-IR/Articles/01-futex.pdf)
|
|
|
|
type Mutex struct {
|
|
futex Futex
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (m *Mutex) Lock() {
|
|
// Fast path: try to take an uncontended lock.
|
|
if m.futex.CompareAndSwap(0, 1) {
|
|
// We obtained the mutex.
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The futex is contended, so we enter the contended loop.
|
|
// If we manage to change the futex from 0 to 2, we managed to take the
|
|
// lock. Else, we have to wait until a call to Unlock unlocks this mutex.
|
|
// (Unlock will wake one waiter when it finds the futex is set to 2 when
|
|
// unlocking).
|
|
for m.futex.Swap(2) != 0 {
|
|
// Wait until we get resumed in Unlock.
|
|
m.futex.Wait(2)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (m *Mutex) Unlock() {
|
|
if old := m.futex.Swap(0); old == 0 {
|
|
// Mutex wasn't locked before.
|
|
panic("sync: unlock of unlocked Mutex")
|
|
} else if old == 2 {
|
|
// Mutex was a contended lock, so we need to wake the next waiter.
|
|
m.futex.Wake()
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TryLock tries to lock m and reports whether it succeeded.
|
|
//
|
|
// Note that while correct uses of TryLock do exist, they are rare,
|
|
// and use of TryLock is often a sign of a deeper problem
|
|
// in a particular use of mutexes.
|
|
func (m *Mutex) TryLock() bool {
|
|
// Fast path: try to take an uncontended lock.
|
|
if m.futex.CompareAndSwap(0, 1) {
|
|
// We obtained the mutex.
|
|
return true
|
|
}
|
|
return false
|
|
}
|