Multisampling/averaging (using the Samples configuration property) was
returning incorrect values. When I investigated this, I found that the
samd51 gives erratic values when using multisampling together with fewer
than 16 bits resolution.
I fixed this by forcing 16 bit resolution when multisampling, and
adjusting the output to account for multisampling.
Found while reading the battery value on a pybadge, which gave
non-sensible values with Samples set to a value larger than 1.
This improves slightly. It also is some groundwork for better DMA
support in TinyGo in the future.
I'm not entirely sure why it improves performance (in theory the old
code should already saturate the SPI bus) but it does, so 🤷
The SPI frequency was rounded up, not rounded down. This meant that if
you wanted to configure 15MHz for example, it would pick the next
available frequency (24MHz). That's unsafe, the safe option is to round
down and the SPI support for most other chips also rounds down for this
reason.
In addition, I've improved SPI clock selection so that it will pick the
best clock of the two, widening the available frequencies. See the
comments in the patch for details.
As discussed on Slack, I believe this property does more harm than good:
* I don't think it's used anywhere. None of the drivers use it.
* It is not fully implemented. While values <= 8 might work fine,
values larger than 8 result in extra zero bits (instead of anything
sensible).
* Worse, it doesn't return an error when it's out of range. This is
not an optional property: if the SPI peripheral doesn't support a
particular number of bits, it should return an error instead of
silently limiting the number of bits. This will be confusing to
users.
Therefore, I propose we drop it. Maybe there are good uses for it
(perhaps for displays that use big endian 16-bit values?), but without a
good use case like a driver in tinygo.org/x/drivers, I think it's more
trouble than it's worth.
There was a very subtle bug in the ADC read code: it stores a pointer to
a variable in a register, waits for the hardware to complete the read,
and then reads the value again from the local variable. Unfortunately,
the compiler doesn't know there is some form of synchronization
happening in between.
This can be fixed in roughly two ways:
* Introduce some sort of synchronization.
* Do a volatile read from the variable.
I chose the second one as it is probably the least intrusive. We
certainly don't need atomic instructions (the chip is single threaded),
we just need to tell the compiler the value could have changed by making
the read volatile.
We have an optimization for this specific pattern, but it's really just
a hack. With the addition of unsafe.Add in Go 1.17 we can directly
specify the intent instead and eventually remove this special case.
The code is also easier to read.
machine/stm32, nrf: implement machine.Flash
Implements the machine.Flash interface using the same definition as the tinyfs BlockDevice.
This implementation covers the stm32f4, stm32l4, stm32wlx, nrf51, nrf52, and nrf528xx processors.
deadprogram
sago35
Scott Feldman
Ayke van Laethem
Kenneth Bell
Daniel Esteban
Bjoern Poetzschke
John Clark
Patricio Whittingslow
Yurii Soldak