TODO: Remove the go.mod/go.sum in internal/tools once doing so doesn't break CI (e.g. once we drop support for go 1.19)
* builder/cc1as.h: fix typo found by 'make spell'
* GNUmakefile: remove exception for inbetween, fix instance now found by 'make spell'
* GNUmakefile: remove exception for programmmer, fix instance now found by 'make spell'
* go.mod: use updated misspell. GNUmakefile: add spellfix target, use it.
* ignore directories properly when invoking spellchecker.
* make spell: give internal/tools its own go.mod, as misspell requires newer go
* make lint: depend on tools and run the installed revive
(which was perhaps implied by the change that added revive to internal/tools,
but not required in GNUmakefile until we gave internal/tools its own temporary go.mod)
* .github: now that 'make spell' works well, run it from CI
* GNUmakefile: make spell now aborts if it finds misspelt words, so what it finds doesn't get lost in CI logs
* GNUmakefile: tools: avoid -C option on go generate to make test-llvm15-go119 circleci job happy, see
https://cs.opensource.google/go/go/+/2af48cbb7d85e5fdc635e75b99f949010c607786
* internal/tools/go.mod: fix format of go version to leave out patchlevel, else go complains.
Go 1.19 started reformatting code in a way that makes it more obvious
how it will be rendered on pkg.go.dev. It gets it almost right, but not
entirely. Therefore, I had to modify some of the comments so that they
are formatted correctly.
Some source code wasn't part of `FMT_PATHS` so wasn't checked for
correct formatting. This change includes all this source code and
excludes cgo/testdata because it contains files that can't be parsed.
FreeBSD support has been broken for a long time, probably since
https://github.com/tinygo-org/tinygo/pull/1860 (merged in May). Nobody
has complained yet, so I am going to assume nobody uses it.
This doesn't remove support for FreeBSD entirely: the code necessary to
build TinyGo on FreeBSD is still there. It just removes the code
necessary to build binaries targetting FreeBSD. But again, it could very
well be broken as we don't test it.
If anybody wants to re-enable support for FreeBSD, they would be welcome
to do that. But I think it would at the very least need a smoke test of
some sort.
This doesn't have the potential blocking issue of the getentropy call
(which calls WASI random_get when using wasi-libc) and should therefore
be a lot faster.
For context, this is what the random_get documentation says:
> Write high-quality random data into a buffer. This function blocks
> when the implementation is unable to immediately provide sufficient
> high-quality random data. This function may execute slowly, so when
> large mounts of random data are required, it's advisable to use this
> function to seed a pseudo-random number generator, rather than to
> provide the random data directly.
dkegel-fastly
Damian Gryski
Yurii Soldak
Ayke van Laethem