In order to scan stacks, the GC preempts all other threads and has them scan their own stack.
This is somewhat expensive since all of these threads have to fight over a single lock.
Instead, save the stack bounds and let the GC thread perform the scan.
This also fixes a few other bugs I ran into:
1. The GC starts scanning before the world stops. This can cause it to miss some objects (and mistakenly free them) if memory is modified while stopping.
2. The GC does not wait for threads to resume. This can cause notifications to be misinterpreted due to signal nesting if the GC is re-run before all threads wake.
Found this bug while trying to use the upstream testing package instead
of our own. The io/fs package wasn't passing, because the test was run
in a separate goroutine (and therefore a separate thread, with its own
stack) instead of all in the same thread with our own stack
creation/switching implementation.
For the threads scheduler, it makes sense to have NumCPU available.
For all other schedulers, the number of available CPUs is practically
limited to one by the scheduler (even though the system might have more
CPUs).
This is not a scheduler in the runtime, instead every goroutine is
mapped to a single OS thread - meaning 1:1 scheduling.
While this may not perform well (or at all) for large numbers of
threads, it greatly simplifies many things in the runtime. For example,
blocking syscalls can be called directly instead of having to use epoll
or similar. Also, we don't need to do anything special to call C code -
the default stack is all we need.
Nia Waldvogel
Ayke van Laethem