Instead of always starting a new goroutine for the main goroutine, run
the main goroutine on the system stack.
The system stack is not occupied with scheduling, instead each goroutine
that wants to pause itself calls into the scheduler which will switch to
the next task (goroutine) to run, or sleeps.
There are various advantages of this over the previous system:
* When the program doesn't start a goroutine, the code size and RAM
consumption is close to what you'd get with `-scheduler=none`.
* When the program does start a goroutine, there is still a reduction
in RAM consumption because only one extra stack is needed.
* Because tasks directly switch to the next task to run, only a single
task switch is needed instead of two (goroutine -> scheduler ->
goroutine). This should improve task switching performance.
I kept the current behavior for WebAssembly/Asyncify. I looked into how
the same benefits can be realized for WebAssembly but couldn't easily
find how to do that. Maybe this can be done separately, or maybe we'll
just wait for the stack switching proposal to finish.
The code for Cortex-M is currently more complicated than I'd like, and
therefore can sometimes result in a slight increase in code size. I'd
like to fix this eventually but am still looking into good ways to do
this. I still think this change is generally beneficial because many
programs see big reductions in code size when compiling for Cortex-M.
This is only very minimal support. More support (such as tinygo flash,
or peripheral access) should be added in later commits, to keep this one
focused.
Importantly, this commit changes the LLVM repo from llvm/llvm-project to
tinygo-org/llvm-project. This provides a little bit of versioning in
case something changes in the Espressif fork. If we want to upgrade to
LLVM 11 it's easy to switch back to llvm/llvm-project until Espressif
has updated their fork.
Ayke van Laethem